Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
S

Slater v. Pearle Vision Center, Inc.

376 Pa. Super. 580 (1988)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Slater v. Pearle Vision Center, Inc.

Pennsylvania Superior Court
376 Pa. Super. 580 (1988)

DD

Facts

Pearle Vision Center, Inc. (Pearle) (defendant) leased property in a shopping mall from Maurice Slater, owner of Bloomsburg Shopping Center (the shopping center) (plaintiff). The lease had a use clause stating that the property would be used only as a vision center. Another provision said that Pearle would open for business no later than 90 days after receiving approval from the shopping center. The lease included abandonment as a ground for default but contained a narrow exception for a vacancy due to repairs or transfer to a franchisee or assignee. Although Pearle paid the rent under the lease, it never occupied the property. The shopping center was concerned that a vacant store would diminish business for the mall as a whole. The shopping center filed suit, seeking an injunction requiring Pearle to occupy and use the property. The trial court dismissed the shopping center’s complaint, finding that Pearle did not have an express or implied obligation to occupy and use the property. The shopping center appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Beck, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Property

Key Terms