Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Slayton v. McDonald

Louisiana Court of Appeals
690 So.2d 914 (1997)


Facts

Slayton (plaintiff) and McDonald (defendant), both minor boys, got into an argument while riding the school bus to their respective homes. Slayton, the larger of the two boys, threatened to go to McDonald’s house to fight McDonald. McDonald told Slayton not to come to his home. Later that afternoon, McDonald saw Slayton walking up his driveway. McDonald yelled for Slayton to go home, but Slayton continued to the house. McDonald went into his house, retrieved a shotgun, went back outside, and began loading the weapon within view of Slayton. Slayton still refused to leave the premises. McDonald then retreated into his home and called 911 for help. As McDonald talked to the 911 operator, Slayton entered the house. A frightened McDonald demanded that Slayton leave six times. In response, Slayton dared McDonald to shoot him. Slayton continued walking into the home. Around that time, Slayton’s sister arrived at McDonald’s house. While still speaking to the 911 operator, McDonald shot Slayton one time in the knee. Slayton’s parents incurred over $43,000 in medical bills. Slayton, by and through his parents, filed suit against McDonald and McDonald’s parents for battery, seeking recovery of damages and medical expenses. The trial court held for McDonald. Slayton appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Williams, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.