Sligar v. Odell

233 P.3d 914, 2010 WL 2674037 (2010)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sligar v. Odell

Washington Court of Appeals
233 P.3d 914, 2010 WL 2674037 (2010)

Facts

Mary Sligar (plaintiff) and Kara and David Odell (defendants) were next-door neighbors whose properties were separated by a six-foot-high chain-link fence. The Odells owned two dogs, Chico, a Labrador retriever, and Molly, a golden retriever. Sligar owned three miniature schnauzers, including Pearl. One day, while attempting to move Pearl away from the fence, Sligar tripped and fell against it. Her finger protruded through the fence, and Chico bit it. Sligar sued the Odells for damages, alleging statutory strict liability and common-law negligence. The Odells moved for summary judgment on both claims. They argued that they were not strictly liable because Sligar was not lawfully on their property. Sligar responded that she had the Odells’ implied consent because she had previously reached through the fence to pet Molly, leaned on the fence while talking to the Odells, and attached chicken wire to her side of the fence. As to the negligence claim, the Odells asserted that they were not negligent because there was no evidence that Chico had dangerous propensities or that they breached any duty by keeping him within their fenced yard. The trial court granted summary judgment for the Odells on both claims. Sligar appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cox, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 905,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 995 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 995 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership