Sligh v. First National Bank of Holmes County

704 So. 2d 1020 (1997)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sligh v. First National Bank of Holmes County

Mississippi Supreme Court
704 So. 2d 1020 (1997)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Gene Lorance drove drunk and uninsured and caused a car accident that left William Sligh paralyzed. Lorance was a reckless habitual drunk driver who had already been in multiple car accidents, and he went to prison for injuring Sligh. Sligh and his wife (plaintiffs) sued and obtained a $5 million default judgment against Lorance, but Lorance had no assets except for interests in two spendthrift trusts his mother set up before she died. The trustee held discretion to pay the income to Lorance for life, with the remainder directed to two others. The Slighs sued the trustee, First National Bank of Holmes County, the two remaindermen, and Lorance (defendants) to garnish the trust accounts. The Slighs claimed Lorance’s mother knew Lorance was a habitual drunk with mental deficiencies who had been treated unsuccessfully for alcoholism, knew about his drunk-driving habits and accidents, and established the trusts to enable him to continue that lifestyle while shielding his trust interests from creditors. The trial court dismissed, reasoning the Slighs could not garnish the spendthrift trusts. The Slighs appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mills, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership