Smallwood v. NCSoft Corp.
United States District Court for the District of Hawaii
730 F. Supp. 2d 1213 (2010)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
NCSoft Corp. and a related entity (together, NCSoft) (defendants) produced a computer game played over the internet called Lineage II. Craig Smallwood (plaintiff) alleged in a complaint against NCSoft that Smallwood had played the game between 2004 and 2009 and experienced psychological dependence and addiction to the game, like other users. NCSoft was allegedly aware of the risk of addiction but never warned anyone about the risk or how to safely play the game. Indeed, to increase its profits, NCSoft allegedly locked Smallwood out of Lineage II in 2009 even though Smallwood had paid for account access to get him to purchase a license to play NCSoft’s newer game, Aion. Smallwood’s addiction to Lineage II continued, and having been locked out, he experienced withdrawal symptoms. Smallwood suffered from depression, became psychologically distressed, and had trouble in independently engaging in daily activities like getting dressed and bathing. Smallwood was hospitalized at one point and, at the time of filing his complaint, was attending therapy three times a week. Smallwood’s complaint alleged various causes of action, including negligence, gross negligence, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. NCSoft filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kay, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.