Smith & Edwards v. Golden Spike Little League

577 P.2d 132 (1978)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Smith & Edwards v. Golden Spike Little League

Utah Supreme Court
577 P.2d 132 (1978)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In 1974, residents (defendants) in a suburb in Utah obtained a charter from Little League Baseball, Inc., to create their own team, Golden Spike Little League (defendant). Although the league was recognized by the national little league association, the team itself was never incorporated. Additionally, the charter did not grant any authority to the team to make any purchases on the national association’s behalf. One of the residents, David Anderson, was tasked with finding equipment for the team. Anderson received a price quote from Albert Smith, the owner of Smith & Edwards (plaintiff). Anderson informed Smith that the team would obtain the needed merchandise from his store, but how the team would pay for the equipment was never discussed. Smith then went out of town for business. During this time, many of the residents involved in the team would pick up different items from the store without paying. The residents would inform the employees that they were obtaining the equipment for Golden Spike Little League. When Smith returned, he informed the residents that they had obtained $3,900 worth of merchandise. The residents began a fund-raising operation for the amount owed but raised only $149. In response, Smith filed a suit against the residents and the team. The trial court held that Golden Spike Little League was responsible for the amount owed to Smith but, because the team was not incorporated, the residents were not personally liable for the amount owed. Smith appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Crockett, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership