Smith & Lee Associates v. City of Taylor
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
102 F.3d 781 (1996)
- Written by Jennifer Flinn, JD
Facts
Smith & Lee Associates, Inc. (S&L) (plaintiff) was a for-profit corporation that operated Adult Foster Care (AFC) homes throughout Michigan. AFC homes provided 24-hour supervision to adults who need constant supervision but not continuous nursing care. S&L purchased a home, Mortenview Manor, located in a residential neighborhood in the City of Taylor (the city) (defendant). Mortenview housed six elderly disabled residents who suffered from various forms of dementia. Although some AFC homes received government subsidies, Mortenview did not and relied exclusively on payments from residents to operate. Mortenview was located in a residential neighborhood zoned for single-family use. Michigan law allowed AFC homes to house up to six disabled adults in any residential zone. S&L, however, wanted to house 12 residents at Mortenview. S&L petitioned the city to rezone Mortenview from a single-family use classification to a multiple-family use classification. The city considered S&L’s petition in a public hearing and denied the petition because it opposed spot zoning and because rezoning Mortenview would be inconsistent with the city’s master land-use plan. S&L filed a lawsuit against the city, alleging that the city had violated the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 by intentionally discriminating against and failing to make reasonable accommodations for disabled residents. The trial court ruled in favor of S&L, finding both that the city had intentionally discriminated against disabled residents and had failed to make reasonable accommodations for disabled residents. The trial court ordered the city to allow S&L to house 12 residents at Mortenview. The city appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.