Smith v. Barnesandnoble.com
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
839 F.3d 163 (2016)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
Cheryl Smith (plaintiff) owned the copyright in a book written by her late husband. Mr. Smith had contracted with an e-book distributor to market the book. The agreement provided for distribution of electronic samples of the book with a license for free, noncommercial use, duplication, and sharing by end users. The agreement also authorized the distribution of paper samples and did not distinguish between the treatment of paper and electronic samples. Nothing in the agreement suggested that a customer’s right to use a validly obtained sample would terminate if the agreement itself was terminated. In accordance with that agreement, the distributor provided the book for sale and sampling to Barnesandnoble.com, LLC (Barnes & Noble) (defendant), which listed the book for sale and made free samples available on its website. Mr. Smith later canceled the agreement because no copies of the book were sold. However, before the agreement was terminated, a single customer obtained a digital sample from Barnes & Noble. The sample was stored in a cloud-based digital locker associated with the customer’s account, which was effectively a bookshelf for digital products. The customer accessed the sample on two occasions after the distributorship agreement was terminated. Cheryl filed suit, alleging that Barnes & Noble violated her copyright by allowing the customer to retain access to the digital sample after the agreement was terminated. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Barnes & Noble, and Cheryl appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jacobs, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.


