Smith v. City of Salem
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
378 F.3d 566 (2004)
Jimmie Smith (plaintiff) was a firefighter for the City of Salem, Ohio (defendant). Smith, a transsexual, was diagnosed with Gender Identity Disorder (GID) and began appearing and acting more feminine. Smith’s coworkers commented on his transition and told Smith that he was not masculine enough. Smith’s supervisors and other high-level municipal officers (defendants) became aware of Smith’s transition and allegedly conspired to terminate Smith’s employment. Smith sued the defendants, claiming sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The district court found that Smith had failed to state a claim for sex stereotyping and that protection under Title VII was not available to transsexuals. Smith appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cole, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.