Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Smith v. Comair, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
134 F.3d 254 (1998)


Facts

During a layover at the Cincinnati, Ohio airport, James Smith (plaintiff) was told by a representative from Comair, Inc. and Delta Airlines, Inc. (defendants), that he could not board his connecting flight. The representative did not give a reason to Smith regarding why he could not board the airplane. Also, Smith noticed two security guards standing approximately 70 feet away, observing him. Several hours later, Smith was informed that he was detained because company employees failed to get photo identification from Smith during the check-in process in Roanoke, Virginia. Because Smith had left his wallet in his vehicle at the Roanoke airport, he did not have the required identification to present to the defendants. However, Smith offered to have his physical description faxed by the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles or to have defendants obtain his wallet and fly it to Cincinnati. The representative declined Smith’s offer. Later, Smith was given a ticket to return to Roanoke. While waiting to board the return flight, Smith told the representative that he wanted to punch him. Two security guards, one of whom was a police officer, briefly restrained Smith. The representative told the security guards to remove Smith from the airport. However, the security guard who was a police officer convinced the representative to allow Smith to fly to Roanoke. Smith filed suit against the defendants in state court alleging false imprisonment. The action was removed to federal district court. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants on the ground that Smith’s complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Smith appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Wilkinson, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.