Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co.
Illinois Supreme Court
560 N.E.2d 324 (1990)

- Written by Emily Laird, JD
Facts
Sandra Smith (plaintiff) sued Eli Lilly & Co. and other drug manufacturers (collectively, the DES manufacturers) (defendants) on the bases of negligence and strict liability for injuries she alleged were caused by her mother’s ingestion of diethylstilbestrol (DES) during pregnancy. Smith claimed she had adequately proved causation on the grounds of market-share liability, a form of liability that holds a manufacturer responsible for the percentage of a claimant’s awarded damages corresponding with the percentage of the market share the manufacturer’s products represented. The DES manufacturers argued that market-share liability improperly eliminated the fundamental principle of tort law that required a claimant to prove that a manufacturer caused the claimant’s alleged injury. The trial court dismissed the DES manufacturers’ motion for summary judgment, holding market-share liability satisfied Smith’s duty to prove causation. The appellate court affirmed the dismissal of the motion. The DES manufacturers appealed to the state supreme court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ryan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.