Court of Appeals of New York
111 N.E.2d 209 (1953)
H. Gordon Smith (plaintiff) sued William S. Kirkpatrick (defendant) for breach of an employment contract. Kirkpatrick moved for summary judgment on the ground that there was no agreement between the two in compliance with the statute of frauds. The court granted summary judgment to Kirkpatrick but gave Smith leave to amend his complaint in order to bring a claim for the “value of his services.” Smith filed an amended complaint in which he alleged that he and Kirkpatrick had established a partnership or joint venture as to which profits were to be shared equally. After a nonjury trial, the court dismissed the complaint for lacking sufficient evidence to establish Smith’s causes of action. Smith did not appeal. He later brought a second lawsuit against Kirkpatrick in which he sought to recover the reasonable value of services provided under a quantum meruit theory. Kirkpatrick moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it was barred by res judicata. The trial court denied Kirkpatrick’s motion. On appeal, the Appellate Division reversed and dismissed Smith’s complaint. Smith appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 200,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.