Smith v. Millville Rescue Squad

139 A.3d 1 (2016)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Smith v. Millville Rescue Squad

New Jersey Supreme Court
139 A.3d 1 (2016)

Facts

Robert Smith (plaintiff) worked as a paramedic for the Millville Rescue Squad (MRS) (defendant). Smith’s wife, Mary, also worked for MRS. Smith engaged in an affair with an intern whom he supervised, leading to marital discord. Smith told his supervisor, John Redden (defendant), about the situation. Redden responded by suggesting that Smith’s future employment status might be in jeopardy. Several months later, Smith’s marriage collapsed. Redden raised further doubts about Smith’s status with MRS, expressing concerns about the possibility of an unpleasant divorce. MRS then terminated Smith, citing reasons involving his work performance. Smith brought an action against MRS and Redden under New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination, which applied to workplace discrimination and which included marital status among its protected categories (though the term “marital status” was not defined). At trial, it was established that no serious issues pertaining to Smith’s work performance had been brought to Smith’s attention during his employment. It was also shown that several MRS employees had obtained divorces during their employment without repercussion and that Mary had engaged in an affair with another MRS employee, similarly without adverse consequences. The court granted a motion to dismiss, holding that Smith’s claim did not give rise to discrimination on the basis of marital status. Smith appealed. The appellate division reversed. The case was appealed to the New Jersey Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cuff, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 783,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 783,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 783,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership