Smith v. Shaughnessy
United States Supreme Court
318 U.S. 176, 63 S. Ct. 545, 87 L. Ed. 690 (1943)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Seventy-two-year-old Hurlbut Smith (plaintiff) gave his 44-year-old second wife $571,000 worth of stock in an irrevocable trust. The trust paid her the income for life and would return the stock to Smith only if he outlived her. Otherwise, the stock would go to whomever his wife’s will designated or to her heirs at law. Essentially, the gift involved three interests: his wife’s life estate in the income; her remainder interest in the corpus if she outlived him; and his reversionary interest if he outlived her. Internal revenue collector Frank Shaughnessy (defendant) assessed a $71,764 gift tax. Smith paid the tax under protest and sued for a refund. Smith conceded that his wife’s life-estate interest was subject to gift tax, and the tax collector conceded that Smith’s reversionary interest was not. That left the only remaining dispute whether the value of his wife’s remainder interest was subject to gift tax. The trial court found it not taxable, reasoning the gift had not been completed, but the appellate court reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)
Dissent (Roberts, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
