Smith v. Smith

917 So. 2d 400 (2005)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Smith v. Smith

Florida District Court of Appeal
917 So. 2d 400 (2005)

Facts

Seventy-nine-year-old Ann Smith (defendant) had assets totaling approximately $191,000 in value. Her stepson, Nathan Smith (plaintiff), managed her financial affairs under a power of attorney authorizing him to do so. Ann’s stepdaughter, Cassandra Dinkins, lived with Ann. When Nathan learned that Ann had spent approximately $11,000 to purchase Dinkins a vehicle, he petitioned for an order deeming Ann incompetent and appointing a guardian over her person and property. The petition alleged that Ann was incapacitated by her diagnosed Alzheimer’s-like dementia. The trial court appointed Teresa Barton, a professional guardian, as Ann’s temporary guardian while the petition was pending. A four-person committee established by the court evaluated Ann’s competency. All four committee members concluded that Ann suffered from dementia and recommended appointing a guardian over her person and property. At the hearing, Ann showed confusion during her testimony, mixing dates, forgetting her attorney’s name, and struggling to perform basic math problems. However, Ann’s attorney called two expert witnesses who attested to her competency. Psychologist Charles English testified that after spending approximately four hours with Ann, he felt she could enter contracts, manage property, and consent to medical treatment on her own behalf. Licensed psychotherapist and social worker Milton Collins similarly testified that Ann was capable of managing her own affairs. He deemed Ann medically stable, alert, and oriented, and questioned the validity of her dementia diagnosis. Based on all the evidence, the trial court deemed Ann incompetent to make decisions about her person and property, except as to decisions regarding where to reside, how to vote, and whom to socialize with. The court appointed Barton as Ann’s limited guardian, giving her authority to make all decisions regarding Ann’s person and property except those related to residence, voting, and socializing. Ann appealed, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support a finding of incapacity, making the appointment of a guardian improper.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Griffin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 905,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 995 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 995 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership