Smith v. Sneller
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
26 A.2d 452 (1942)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Joseph Smith (plaintiff) was a door-to-door salesman with extremely impaired vision, almost to the point of blindness. Smith did not use a cane or a service dog while working in downtown Philadelphia. One day, Smith fell into a ditch dug across a sidewalk by Peter Sneller and Herman Lomastro (defendants). He failed to see the two-foot pile of dirt at the start of the ditch or the barricade at the other end. Smith sued Sneller and Lomastro for negligence. The trial court held in favor of Smith. Sneller appealed and the Superior Court reversed, holding that Smith’s recovery was barred by contributory negligence because Smith’s own negligence contributed to his injuries. Smith appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Drew, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 965,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.



