Smith v. State
Georgia Supreme Court
788 S.E.2d 433 (2016)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Deonte T'varis Smith (defendant) was charged with the killing of a baby. At trial, the prosecution (plaintiff) called Dr. Clark as an expert witness. Over Smith’s objection, Dr. Clark used a doll to demonstrate how the victim sustained some of the injuries, including the force that would have been needed. Clark squeezed the doll’s chest to simulate the victim’s rib fractures and slammed the doll’s head several times to simulate the victim’s head injuries. The doll was approximately the same size as the victim. Clark based his testimony and demonstration on the autopsy results and the victim’s medical records. Clark acknowledged not knowing exactly how many times the victim’s head was slammed. Clark never referenced Smith nor any other perpetrator during the demonstration. Smith was convicted, and he appealed, arguing that the prosecution’s demonstrative evidence was unfairly prejudicial.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nahmias, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
