Smith v. State Department of Health and Hospitals

676 So. 2d 543 (1996)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Smith v. State Department of Health and Hospitals

Louisiana Supreme Court
676 So. 2d 543 (1996)

KL

Facts

Benjamin Smith underwent foot surgery in August 1987. While at the hospital, Smith underwent a routine chest X-ray that showed a mass in his chest. The radiologist’s report noted the mass and recommended a computed-tomography (CT) scan to rule out lymphoma. The hospital discharged Smith without informing him of the X-ray findings. In October 1988, Smith returned to the hospital for chest pain and received a chest X-ray, which revealed that the mass in Smith’s chest had doubled in size. At that time, Smith learned of the results of the August 1987 X-ray. Smith was diagnosed with a fast-acting, lethal cancer and died several months later after undergoing aggressive treatment. Smith’s family (plaintiffs) sued the State Department of Health and Hospitals (the state) (defendant). The parties presented expert testimony that Smith had a chance of survival had he begun treatment after his August 1987 X-ray, and that Smith had a negligible chance of survival in October 1988. The trial court concluded that Smith’s family had failed to prove that the delay in treatment caused Smith’s death or a lost chance of survival. The appellate court reversed and held that damages should be calculated by determining the amount Smith’s family would receive for a wrongful-death claim and reducing that amount based on the percentage chance of survival Smith lost due to the state’s malpractice. The state appealed to the Louisiana Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lemmon, J.)

Dissent (Victory, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 777,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership