Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Smolen v. Smolen

Supreme Court of Nevada
956 P.2d 128 (Nev. 1998)


Facts

In 1970, Martin Smolen and Roslyn Smolen (plaintiff) married. Decades later, Martin developed a brain tumor, and the couple divorced in 1994 in order to protect their assets from the costs of his future medical care. In its divorce decree, the district court ordered that their mutual residence in Las Vegas would remain in joint tenancy. Martin and Roslyn intended that the survivor would own the residence. Later in 1994, Martin’s condition deteriorated. Roslyn obtained legal guardianship of him without his consent, and put him in a group home against his wishes. Martin then contacted his nephew Jason Smolen (defendant), who hired an attorney to assist Martin. The attorney moved for Roslyn’s guardianship to be revoked, and the district court granted the motion in 1995. Martin then established a trust with Jason as the sole beneficiary and successor trustee, and deeded his interest in the Las Vegas residence to the trust. Martin later suffered a stroke and died in October 1995. Two months later, Roslyn moved to cancel the deed transferring Martin’s interest to the trust. Roslyn argued that she and Martin had intended for the survivor to be the sole owner of the residence. Roslyn argued that the divorce decree recognized that the residence was held in joint tenancy, and implicitly prohibited the destruction of the joint tenancy. The district court agreed that the deed violated the divorce decree and was void. Jason then appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.