From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Snap-On Tools Corporation v. Rice
Arizona Court of Appeals
781 P.2d 76 (1989)
Larry Neal owned a tire business. Neal purchased tools from Snap-On Tools Corporation (Snap-On) (plaintiff). Neal financed the purchase with Snap-On and gave Snap-On a security interest in the tools. Snap-On did not perfect the security interest by filing a financing statement. Randy Rice (defendant) was Neal’s employee. Rice purchased the tire business from Neal. The sale contract included the tools from Snap-On that were still subject to Snap-On’s security interest. Neal attempted to transfer the Snap-On account balance to Rice’s name. However, Neal was unable to transfer the account to Rice because Snap-On rejected Rice’s credit application. Neal kept most of the Snap-On tools that were subject to the security interest, but Neal left Rice a tire balancer and a compressor that were necessary to the business. Rice knew Neal owed money to Snap-On, but he did not know Snap-On had a security interest in the tools. The Snap-On account stayed in Neal’s name, and Rice believed that Neal was going to pay the Snap-On balance. Neal never paid the balance and soon filed for bankruptcy. Snap-On unsuccessfully attempted to repossess the tire balancer and compressor from Rice. Snap-On sued Rice and had the sheriff preliminarily repossess the tools. Rice then testified that he had no knowledge of Snap-On’s security interest. The trial court ordered Snap-On to return of the tools to Rice. Snap-On appealed, arguing that its security interest was superior to Rice’s rights in the tools.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Roll, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.