Snyder v. Michael's Stores, Inc.

945 P.2d 781, 68 Cal. Rptr. 2d 476, 16 Cal. 4th 991 (1997)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Snyder v. Michael’s Stores, Inc.

California Supreme Court
945 P.2d 781, 68 Cal. Rptr. 2d 476, 16 Cal. 4th 991 (1997)

Facts

Naomi Snyder worked for Michael’s Stores, Inc. (Michael’s) (defendant). On October 2, 1993, Naomi was working at Michael’s when a janitorial contractor operated a floor-buffing machine in the store without adequate ventilation, exposing 21 people to hazardous levels of carbon monoxide. Naomi was pregnant with Mikayla Snyder (plaintiff) at the time. Mikayla was born with permanent damage to her brain and nervous system because of the carbon monoxide exposure. Mikayla filed suit against Michael’s for negligence. Michael’s demurred, and the trial court granted the demurrer. Mikayla appealed. The appellate court reversed. Michael’s appealed, arguing that Mikayla’s injury was a derivative injury of Naomi’s and Mikayla was an employee of Michael’s while she was in utero, and therefore, workers’ compensation was Mikayla’s exclusive remedy. Michael’s further argued that policy reasons supported a bar to Mikayla’s claim because federal antidiscrimination law prevented businesses from adequately protecting fetuses by excluding fertile women from potentially hazardous jobs.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Werdegar, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 826,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 991 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 991 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership