Soames v. Indiana Department of Natural Resources
Court of Appeals of Indiana
934 N.E.2d 1154 (2010)
- Written by Eric Cervone, LLM
Facts
Cynthia Soames (plaintiff) was a landowner. Soames entered into a lease agreement with Young Oil Company (Young). Under the agreement, Young operated several oil wells on Soames’s property. A short time later, Soames filed a complaint against Young alleging breach of contract. Young eventually stopped oil production on Soames’s property when the lease agreement was terminated by a court. The state’s Department of Natural Resources (the department) (defendant) issued notices to Young alleging that the wells it operated on Soames’s property were in noncompliance with state law. The department instructed Young to plug the wells. Young offered to plug the wells, but Soames refused to permit Young to enter her property. An administrative-law judge held that both Young and Soames had a duty to plug the wells. Young appealed the decision, arguing that Soames prevented Young from plugging the wells. A hearing was then held in front of the department. The department adopted the administrative-law judge’s finding, but added that Soames may, at her expense, select a licensed professional to observe and record the plugging of the wells. Soames argued that the relevant statute did not mandate plugging, and that the department abused its discretion by holding that plugging was required. Soames petitioned for judicial review. The trial court denied the petition. Soames appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Najam, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.