Society for California Archaeology v. County of Butte, Irvin Schlaf
California Court of Appeals
135 Cal. Rptr. 679 (1977)

- Written by Kelli Lanski, JD
Facts
The Society for California Archaeology (society) (plaintiff) filed a petition for a writ of mandate asking the court to require the County of Butte (Butte) (defendant) to revoke its approval of a 31-acre residential development in California. As part of the approval process for the development, Butte’s planning commission prepared an environmental-impact report (EIR). The EIR referenced six archaeological sites within the area proposed for the residential development and concluded that the development proposal would have a significant effect on cultural resources of local significance. Butte’s planning commission approved the draft EIR, after which the EIR was discussed at a public hearing led by Butte’s board of supervisors (the board). Members of the public objected to the development being built on archaeological sites, so the board referred the EIR back to the planning commission for additional comments. The planning commission created a supplemental report noting that the archaeological sites were possibly unique, containing Indian mounds, some of which were intact. The board did not discuss the supplemental report’s notes on the environmental impact at subsequent meetings or in writing but did approve the supplemental report and the building project. The final report required the developer to set aside some of the archaeological sites for six months to allow for exploration but did not otherwise address any of the environmental impact of the development on the archaeological sites. The society filed suit afterward, and the trial court denied the writ of mandate. The society appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Paras, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.