Society for Ethical Culture v. Spatt
New York Court of Appeals
415 N.E.2d 922 (1980)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The New York City Landmark Preservation Commission (defendant) designated the Meeting House of the Society of Ethical Culture of the City of New York (the society) (plaintiff) as a landmark. The society was a religious and charitable organization. The commission designated the society’s meeting house as a landmark because the house was the country’s first building of the art nouveau architecture style, which was pioneered by Robert Kohn, who was also the president of the society. The combination of these factors led to the designation, with the commission deeming the meeting house “a tangible symbol of the Society’s permanent social contribution and a rich architectural element of the fabric of our City.” The society brought suit, claiming that the designation and concomitant building restrictions constituted an unconstitutional restriction on the use of property without compensation. Given its size and the size of the meeting house, the society wished to demolish the building, as well as the one next to it on the property, and rebuild to fully maximize the value of the property. The trial court ruled in favor of the society. The appellate court reversed. The society appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wachtler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.