Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.

771 P.2d 711 (1989)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.

Washington Supreme Court
771 P.2d 711 (1989)

DC

Facts

In 1986, the Washington legislature passed a statute that limited noneconomic damages in personal-injury and wrongful-death cases. Under the statute, the trial judge was required to apply a formula that considered the age of the plaintiff at the time of the award to the trier of fact’s damage award. In 1987, following his diagnosis of mesothelioma, Austin Sofie and his wife (plaintiff) sued Fibreboard Corp. and other manufacturers (defendant) for harm to Mr. Sofie caused by his employment-based exposure to asbestos products. A jury ultimately returned a verdict of $1,345,833 for the Sofies, including noneconomic damages for Mr. Sofie’s pain and suffering and Mrs. Sofie’s loss of consortium. Following the verdict, the trial-court judge applied the statutory formula and reduced the noneconomic portion of the verdict from $477,200 to $125,136.45. The Sofies appealed the determination, arguing that the statutory damage cap violated their right to a jury trial under the Washington Constitution.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Utter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership