SoftMan Products Company v. Adobe Systems Inc.
United States District Court for the Central District of California
171 F. Supp. 2d 1075 (2001)
Facts
Adobe Systems Inc. (Adobe) (defendant) sold software programs bundled together, called Adobe Collections. Each program in the Adobe Collections was accompanied by an End User License Agreement (EULA), which prohibited each end user from distributing any of the individual software within the Adobe Collections. The EULA only permitted each end user to distribute the entire Collections bundle to another in conjunction with the EULA. Adobe required each customer to agree to the EULA during the software installation process. SoftMan Products Company (SoftMan) (plaintiff), a software-products distributor, purchased the Adobe Collections software from Adobe. SoftMan then broke apart the bundle and sold individual pieces of Adobe Collections software to customers as single products. In litigation, Adobe filed a motion for preliminary injunction on its counterclaim against SoftMan for copyright infringement, contending that SoftMan’s business practices exceeded the scope of rights permitted by the EULA. SoftMan opposed, contending that the first-sale doctrine of 17 U.S.C. § 109(a) allowed it to resell the software that it had purchased from Adobe. Adobe replied that the first-sale doctrine did not apply because the Adobe–SoftMan transaction was a license, not a sale, and that in any event, SoftMan had assented to the terms of the EULA. It was undisputed, however, that SoftMan did not install any of the pieces of the Adobe Collections software before selling them.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pregerson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 705,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,300 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.