Sojourner A. v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
New Jersey Supreme Court
828 A.2d 306 (2003)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
In 1997, the New Jersey legislature enacted the Work First New Jersey Act, under which the amount of cash assistance a family may receive was determined at the time the family entered the welfare system. If a child was born more than 10 months after the family entered the welfare system, the amount of cash assistance the family received did not increase. However, the family was eligible to receive additional Medicaid and food-stamp benefits. Angela B. and Sojourner A. (plaintiffs) had additional children beyond the 10-month period and were not eligible to receive an increase in financial assistance. Sojourner became pregnant two more times after the birth of the additional child but terminated the pregnancy because of financial concerns. Sojourner and Angela filed suit against the New Jersey Department of Human Services (DHS) (defendant) on the ground that the cap was unconstitutional because it violated the Due Process Clause by interfering with the fundamental right to bear children and the Equal Protection Clause by treating poor children differently based on the child’s birth date. DHS moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted, concluding that the state had a legitimate interest in ensuring people do not rely upon welfare and that the creation of financial-assistance caps bore a substantial relationship to this interest with only a slight imposition to privacy. The appellate division affirmed. The matter was appealed to the New Jersey Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Poritz, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.