Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
S

Sokaitis v. Bakaysa

2010 WL 2383902 (2010)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sokaitis v. Bakaysa

Connecticut Superior Court
2010 WL 2383902 (2010)

SC

Facts

Theresa Sokaitis (Terry) (plaintiff) and Rose Bakaysa (Rose) (defendants) were sisters. Terry and Rose frequently bought state-lottery tickets together and went to legal casinos together. The sisters signed a contract memorializing their long-term agreement that they would share all lottery and casino winnings with each other. At some point, Rose loaned Terry some money, and a disagreement ensued. As part of a discussion regarding the loan, Terry stated that she no longer wanted to be Rose’s lottery partner, and Rose said “okay.” At that point, Rose agreed to a similar winnings-sharing arrangement with their brother, Joe. Terry and Rose stopped buying lottery tickets together and going to the casino together, and in fact they ceased all contact. Subsequently, Rose and Joe won $500,000 at Powerball. Terry sued Rose for breach of contract, claiming that she was entitled to half of Rose’s Powerball winnings. Rose argued that the contract was void or, alternatively, that the parties had rescinded the contract.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sweinton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Contracts

Key Terms