Sokol and Co. v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co.

430 F.3d 417 (2005)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sokol and Co. v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
430 F.3d 417 (2005)

RW

Facts

Sokol and Company (plaintiff) supplied packets of its peanut butter to Continental Mills (Continental). Continental included these packets in boxes of its cookie mixes. When Continental discovered that some of Sokol’s peanut butter had turned rancid, Continental recalled its mixes from retailers. Continental replaced the spoiled packets before they could contaminate Continental’s mixes or reach consumers. Continental billed Sokol for its recall and replacement costs. Sokol tendered these bills to its insurer, Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company (Atlantic) (defendant). When Atlantic refused to cover Continental’s claims, Sokol paid those claims itself and then sued Atlantic for indemnification. A federal district court ruled that the property-impairment and product-recall business-risk exclusions in Sokol’s commercial general liability (CGL) policy precluded coverage and entered judgment for Atlantic. Sokol appealed to the Seventh Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sykes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership