From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Sokolow v. County of San Mateo
California Court of Appeal
261 Cal. Rptr. 520 (1989)
The Mounted Patrol of San Mateo County (defendant) was created in 1942, during World War II, to provide military support and civil defense. The bylaws of the Patrol restricted membership to men. The Patrol continued to operate after World War II and developed an exclusive relationship with the county Sheriff’s office. Patrol members carried badges and cards identifying themselves as Deputy Sheriffs. The county Sheriff was the Commander in Chief of the Patrol. The county Sheriff relied exclusively on the Patrol for equestrian search and rescue. Sonya Sokolow unsuccessfully attempted to become a member of the Patrol for many years. Sokolow (plaintiff) sued the County of San Mateo (defendant), the Patrol, and others (defendants) for sex discrimination. Sokolow alleged that denying her membership in the Patrol was unconstitutional sex discrimination under the equal protection clauses of the United States Constitution and the California Constitution. Sokolow requested the trial court to either order the Patrol to admit her or enjoin the county from continuing its relationship with the Patrol. Sokolow made it clear that her preferred remedy was an order to admit her as a member. The trial court granted summary judgment to Sokolow and required the Patrol to choose between ending its male-only membership policy or severing its relationship with the county. The Patrol elected to sever its relationship with the county. Sokolow then petitioned the trial court for an award of attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and California Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5. The trial court determined that Sokolow was not a prevailing party and declined to award attorney fees. Sokolow appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Merrill, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.