Solar Cells, Inc. v. True North Partners, LLC

2002 WL 749163 (2002)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Solar Cells, Inc. v. True North Partners, LLC

Court of Chancery of Delaware
2002 WL 749163 (2002)

  • Written by John Caddell, JD
Play video

Facts

First Solar, LLC is a manager-managed Delaware LLC. First Solar’s two members, Solar Cells, Inc. (plaintiff) and True North Partners, LLC (True North) (defendant), each initially held 4,500 of First Solar’s voting membership units. According to First Solar’s operating agreement, True North had the right to appoint three of First Solar’s managers, while Solar Cells appointed two. First Solar began facing financial difficulty and exploring a possible restructuring around 2001. On March 7, 2002, the True North managers (defendants) unilaterally issued a document approving the merger of First Solar into First Solar Operating, LLC (FSO), a Delaware LLC wholly owned by True North. The day before this consent was executed, on March 6, a meeting of the full board of managers of First Solar was held, and the True North managers made no mention of the impending merger. The Solar Cells managers received notice of the merger by fax on March 8. It was presented as a fait accompli, set to close on March 15. By the terms of the merger, Solar Cells’ interest in the surviving company would be reduced from 50 percent to five percent. Further, the price terms were based on a valuation that was significantly lower than prior valuations. On March 13, Solar Cells filed for a preliminary injunction blocking the merger, which they allege was negotiated in bad faith and falls short of the entire fairness standard.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Chandler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership