Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Solem v. Bartlett

United States Supreme Court
465 U.S. 463 (1984)


Facts

The federal government initially allocated land to the Indians by placing the Indians on reservations. Beginning in the late 1800s, Congress started to assimilate Indians into broader society, encouraging the Indians to join the national economy through the privatization of land. To support the effort of privatization, Congress passed a series of acts that opened reservations and allotted land to the Indians. Surplus land from the allotments was sometimes retained as reservation land for Indians and was sometimes sold to non-Indians. At the time the laws were passed, Congress paid little attention to whether the opening of land diminished the boundaries of the reservations. Jurisdictional questions arose between the state and the federal governments, each of which was uncertain as to whether the state or the federal government had legal authority over the opened lands. Bartlett (defendant) was an Indian convicted of a state crime committed on what was believed to be Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation (Reservation) land. Bartlett filed a federal habeas corpus petition to overturn the conviction. Bartlett argued that South Dakota lacked jurisdiction to obtain the conviction. South Dakota argued that a 1908 act that opened surplus lands to non-Indians had reduced the land owned by the Reservation and that Bartlett had committed the crime on nonreservation land. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.