Solred SA v. Administración General del Estado

Case C-347/96 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Solred SA v. Administración General del Estado

European Union Court of Justice
Case C-347/96 (1998)

Facts

Article 7(2) of European Council (council) Directive 69/335 (directive) permitted European Economic Community (EEC) member states to impose a capital duty of up to 1 percent on certain transactions. Directive Article 10 (and other directive provisions) prohibited EEC member states from imposing other taxes with the same characteristics as a capital duty. Article 31 of Spain’s tax law called for 0.5 percent tax on notarial deeds and certain other legal documents. Solred SA (plaintiff) was a Spanish company that was formed on November 21, 1990, with a 300-million-peseta share capital and a 180-million-peseta initial contribution. On November 28, Solred paid three million pesetas to the Spanish tax authority (authority) (defendant), which represented 1 percent of Solred’s nominal share capital. By a January 17, 1991, notarial deed, Solred’s remaining capital (120 million pesetas) was contributed. On February 7, Solred notified the authority that it believed Solred owed no additional tax due to the January contribution because Solred paid tax on the full share capital the previous November. The authority disagreed, assessing a 0.5 percent tax because the January notarial deed was a documented legal transaction. Solred sued the authority in Spain. The regional court dismissed Solred’s claim, and Solred appealed. The appellate court stayed the proceeding to obtain a preliminary ruling from the European Union Court of Justice regarding whether (1) the directive prohibited imposing a 0.5 percent duty on a notarial deed recording the partial contribution of a company’s share capital if a 1 percent capital duty already was imposed on the share capital’s full nominal value and (2) if so, whether Solred could enforce the directive. The Spanish government argued that the 0.5 percent duty did not conflict with the directive because (1) the 0.5 percent duty was levied on the January notarial deed rather than on the second capital contribution itself, (2) Solred legally could conduct business without its full capital contribution or the formal recording of its notarial deed, and (3) Solred could have avoided the 0.5 percent duty if its capital was fully contributed at formation.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership