Supreme Court of Virginia
515 S.E.2d 577 (1999)
Alfred and Mary Schaer owned two lots, Lot 38 and Lot 39, in Alexandria, Virginia. In 1995, they sold Lot 38 to Girard and Lynn Miller (plaintiffs). There was a house on Lot 38, and Lot 39 stood vacant. The northern wall of the house intruded onto Lot 39 by approximately one inch. The contract of sale included a provision that the Schaers would enter a restriction into the deed of Lot 39 prohibiting construction of any improvements within three feet of the Lot 38 house. On June 30, 1995, the Schaers executed three documents: a deed conveying Lot 38 to the Millers, a “Declaration of Restriction” prohibiting any construction on Lot 39 within three feet of the Lot 38 house, and a “Declaration of Easement” allowing entry onto Lot 39 for the purpose of maintaining the Lot 38 house. The latter two documents mentioned the Schaers by name, but did not mention the Millers. Both documents were recorded with the local court. In 1997, Sonoma Development, Inc. (Sonoma) (plaintiff) purchased Lot 39 from the Schaers. The deed specified that the property was subject to easements and restrictive covenants. Sonoma soon built a house on Lot 39 within three feet of the Millers’ house. The Millers filed suit. The trial court held that there was a valid restrictive covenant on Lot 39, and ordered Sonoma to remove all improvements within three feet of the Millers’ house. Sonoma appealed, claiming that there was no horizontal privity between the Millers and the Schaers.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kinser, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 236,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.