Sotheby’s v. Federal Express Corp.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
97 F. Supp. 2d 491 (2000)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Sotheby’s (plaintiff) hired Federal Express Corporation (FedEx) (defendant) to transport three pieces of art from London to Newark. Sotheby’s did not declare any special value for the shipment or pay fees to FedEx for additional liability coverage. Sotheby’s did specifically choose a nonstop flight, and the airbill listed only that flight number and identified only Newark as the flight’s destination. The paintings arrived safely in Newark, but FedEx was short-staffed at that location. Because FedEx lacked sufficient personnel to unload the individual cargo pieces from the crate in Newark that day, it loaded the crate onto an airplane going to Memphis. In Memphis, the crate was unloaded, stored in a secure facility overnight, and then flown back to Newark the next morning. However, while the artworks were in Memphis, a forklift damaged one of the pieces, a painting worth approximately $1 million. Sotheby’s sued FedEx for the loss, and both parties moved for partial summary judgment. FedEx claimed that its liability for the damaged painting was limited to the $20 per kilogram allowed under the Warsaw Convention for shipments with no special declared value. Sotheby’s argued that FedEx could not rely on this limitation provision because the Memphis stop was not listed on the airbill. FedEx responded that its airbill’s terms allowed it to make stops not listed on the airbill.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Chin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.