South Camden Citizens in Action v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
274 F.3d 771 (2001)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) (defendant) issued an air pollution permit to St. Lawrence Cement Company (defendant) to build a ground-granulated-blast-furnace-slag grinding facility on its site in the Waterfront South area of Camden, New Jersey, a type of hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facility (TSD). South Camden Citizens in Action (SCCA) (plaintiff) sued, arguing the permit created a disparate racial impact in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and that SCCA had the right to bring a private action to enforce Title VI under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. SCCA alleged the permit issuance amounted to disparate-impact discrimination because Waterfront South, an economically disadvantaged area largely comprised of minorities, already had 20 percent of Camden’s contaminated sites and facilities holding air-pollution permits. Specifically, SCCA argued the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) administrative regulation prohibiting disparate-impact discrimination was promulgated in accordance with Title VI and that the EPA regulation therefore created a federal right enforceable through Section 1983. The district court granted SCCA a preliminary injunction and remanded the case to NJDEP for a Title VI analysis, ruling the SCCA had a private right of action under Section 1983 to enforce the EPA’s disparate-impact discrimination prohibition as an implementation of Title VI. NJDEP and St. Lawrence appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Greenberg, J.)
Dissent (McKee, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.