South Carolina ex rel. Campbell v. O'Leary

64 F.3d 892 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

South Carolina ex rel. Campbell v. O'Leary

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
64 F.3d 892 (1995)

Facts

The United States adopted the Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors program (the program) for the purpose of encouraging foreign countries to convert nuclear reactors from using highly-enriched uranium, which can be used to construct nuclear weapons, to low-enrichment uranium, which cannot. As part of this program, the United States agreed to accept and store highly enriched spent fuel rods from European countries. The Department of Energy (defendant) recommended the preparation of an environmental-impact statement on its long-term plan to build a facility to store 24,000 spent fuel rods from Europe. While the facility was being built, the Department of Energy intended to store spent fuel rods at existing facilities. The Department of Energy recommended the preparation of an environmental assessment of its short-term plan to store 409 spent fuel rods in need of immediate shipment at its Savannah River Site. The Savannah River Site was already approved for storage of spent fuel rods. Additionally, the shipment and storage of the 409 spent fuel rods did not commit the Department of Energy to accepting future shipments. South Carolina (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit and requested an injunction to prevent the storage of the 409 fuel rods. The district court granted the injunction, ruling that the shipment and storage of 409 spent fuel rods constituted an improper segmentation of the larger fuel rod storage project prior to the completion of the environmental-impact statement. The Department of Energy appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Niemeyer, J.)

Dissent (Russell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership