South Carolina v. Baker
United States Supreme Court
485 U.S. 505 (1988)
- Written by Rebecca Wilhelm, JD
Facts
In 1982, Congress amended federal tax laws so that only registered state bonds were eligible for a federal income tax exemption for interest earned on state bonds. The Internal Revenue Service had recommended the change as a way to prevent tax evasion. South Carolina (plaintiff) argued that the statute directly affected state tax policy and thereby violated the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Specifically, South Carolina contended that the federal statute imposed a tax on state bond interest in violation of state sovereignty. The matter was reviewed by the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.