South Dakota State Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO v. Jackley

786 N.W.2d 372 (2010)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

South Dakota State Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO v. Jackley

South Dakota Supreme Court
786 N.W.2d 372 (2010)

JC

Facts

Within South Dakota, a proposed constitutional amendment vote was to be accompanied by a ballot explanation prepared by the state attorney general. That explanation, originally designed simply to identify the amendment to the electorate, was, after statutory amendments, deemed necessary to educate voters as to the purpose and effect of the proposed state constitutional amendment. The attorney general was directed to include the legal consequences of the proposed amendment, including likely state exposure to liability, despite the explanation being limited to 200 words. Proposed Constitutional Amendment K was sent in 2010 to the attorney general for crafting of the explanation. The amendment would require any state or federal election for public office, referendum or ballot initiative, and designation of employee representation to use a guaranteed secret-ballot system. The AFL-CIO (plaintiff) took issue with the explanation provided and sued Attorney General Marty Jackley (defendant) to have the amendment removed from the ballot. Specifically at issue were contentions that the attorney general (1) had failed to provide a clear and simple summary as to the amendment’s effects and purpose and (2) had failed to include any description of the amendment’s legal consequences, including any information regarding potential state liability. At the trial-court level, the court ruled that the summary was proper, and the AFL-CIO appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gilbertson, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership