South Prairie Construction Co. v. Local No. 627, International Union of Operating Engineers

425 U.S. 800 (1976)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

South Prairie Construction Co. v. Local No. 627, International Union of Operating Engineers

United States Supreme Court
425 U.S. 800 (1976)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

South Prairie Construction Co. (South Prairie) and Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co. (Kiewit) (defendants) were wholly owned subsidiaries of Peter Kiewit Sons, Inc. (PKS). Local No. 627, International Union of Operating Engineers (the union) (plaintiff) had a collective-bargaining agreement with Kiewit. South Prairie and Kiewit were engaged in highway construction in Oklahoma. Historically, PKS used Kiewit as its union highway contractor to bid on jobs in Oklahoma, but in 1972, PKS activated South Prairie, its nonunion subsidiary, to do business in Oklahoma as well. The union filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board (the board), alleging that South Prairie and Kiewit had violated the National Labor Relations Act by refusing to apply the terms of the union’s contract with Kiewit to South Prairie’s employees. The union argued that Kiewit and South Prairie constituted a single “employer” under the act and that South Prairie was obligated to recognize the union as all the employees’ exclusive collective-bargaining representative. The board found that Kiewit and South Prairie were separate employees and dismissed the complaint. The court of appeals reversed, deciding on the facts presented that Kiewit and South Prairie were a single employer and, moreover, that their combined employees were an appropriate bargaining unit under the act. The matter came before the Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership