South Road Assoc. v. International Business Machines Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
216 F.3d 251 (2000)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
From the 1950s until 1994, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) (defendant) leased property in New York (the property) for various manufacturing operations. During its lease, IBM used and stored chemicals on the property, some of which were solid waste and some of which were hazardous waste. IBM stored these wastes in underground storage tanks that at one point began leaking into surrounding soil and groundwater. South Road Associates (SRA) (plaintiff) acquired the property around 1979 and continued leasing the property to IBM until 1994. During the 1980s, IBM discovered the leakage and conducted a remediation program. By 1993, New York regulators had largely relieved IBM from further environmental-remediation efforts except for continued monitoring. In 1994, SRA retook possession of the property. Thereafter, SRA brought a citizen suit against IBM for violating the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and specifically, the RCRA’s prohibition on open dumping. SRA alleged that IBM’s acts had caused exceedances of the allowable maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) on the property. The trial court granted IBM’s motion to dismiss based on SRA’s failure to allege current acts of contamination. SRA appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jacobs, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.