Southern California Edison Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
717 F.3d 177 (2013)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the commission) (defendant) regulated the wholesale electricity market. The commission conducted a paper hearing to calculate the reasonable return on equity (ROE) for Southern California Edison Company (SoCal Edison) (plaintiff). SoCal Edison applied for an ROE of 11.5 percent. The commission set SoCal Edison’s ROE at 10.55 percent. After the close of the hearing, 10-year treasury-bond yields dropped by 1.01 percent. As a result, the commission took official notice of the change in bond yields and adjusted SoCal Edison’s ROE down to 9.54 percent. SoCal Edison wanted to provide expert analysis on why treasury-bond yields were not an appropriate proxy for the private cost of equity given the financial crash of 2008, and it requested a rehearing on the adjustment. The commission denied SoCal Edison’s request for a rehearing. SoCal Edison appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rogers, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.