Logourl black

Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. Sullivan, Attorney General

United States Supreme Court
325 U.S. 761 (1945)


Facts

In 1912, Arizona passed the Arizona Train Limit Law, which made it unlawful for any person or corporation to operate a train of more than fourteen passenger or seventy freight cars in Arizona, and authorized the state to collect a monetary fee from anyone that violated this provision. Southern Pacific Co. (plaintiff) owned and operated many trains running throughout the United States that were all longer than the limits required by the Arizona law. As such, whenever Southern Pacific ran trains through Arizona, it had to shorten the length of its trains and increase the train frequency to make up for the decrease in carrying capacity. This resulted in large increases in operating costs and decreases in efficiency. Southern Pacific brought suit against Sullivan (defendant), the Attorney General of Arizona, alleging that the Arizona state law was an unconstitutional restriction on interstate commerce. The trial court agreed with Southern Pacific, but the court of appeals reversed. Southern Pacific Co. appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Stone, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Black, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Douglas, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 86,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 12,053 briefs - keyed to 161 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now