Southern Railway v. Virginia
United States Supreme Court
290 U.S. 190 (1933)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
A Virginia law permitted the Virginia Highway Commissioner (defendant) to order railways to remove crossing grades and build overpasses in their place, when required for public safety. The law permitted the commissioner to order the removal of crossing grades without notice or hearing. The law did not provide for judicial review of the commissioner’s actions but stated that a court of equity could grant relief to a railway if a commissioner’s determination was an arbitrary use of the commissioner’s power. Pursuant to this law, the commissioner, without notice or hearing, ordered Southern Railway (plaintiff) to remove a crossing grade and build an overpass in its place. Southern Railway challenged the determination and argued that the law under which the determination was made was invalid. Specifically, Southern Railway argued that the order deprived it of property without due process. The Virginia Corporation Commission directed Southern Railway to comply with the order, and the Virginia Supreme Court affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McReynolds, J.)
Dissent (Hughes, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
