Southern States Masonry, Inc. v. J.A. Jones Construction Company
Louisiana Supreme Court
507 So. 2d 198 (1987)
- Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Facts
Louisiana World Exposition, Inc. (LWE), was the owner of the 1984 Louisiana World’s Fair. LWE filed bankruptcy and did not pay many of its general contractors in full. J.A. Jones Construction Company (Jones) (defendant) and Landis Construction Company, Inc. (Landis), were two of those general contractors. Jones contracted with Southern States Masonry, Inc. (Southern) (plaintiff), for concrete masonry work. The contract between Jones and Southern contained a clause requiring Jones to pay Southern upon Jones’s receipt of payment from LWE. This type of clause was commonly referred to as a pay-when-paid clause. Jones did not pay Southern for any of the work for which Jones did not receive payment from LWE, relying on the pay-when-paid clause in the contract. Southern subsequently sued Jones. The trial court dismissed Southern’s suit, holding that the pay-when-paid clause conditioned payment by Jones on Jones being paid by LWE. The court of appeals affirmed. Similarly, Landis contracted with Strahan Painting Company (Strahan) for painting on a Landis project at the World’s Fair. Landis’s contract with Strahan provided that Strahan would be paid 90 percent of the value of the work Strahan performed in each month that Landis received payment from LWE. Again, Landis refused to pay Strahan for the work that LWE failed to pay for after LWE’s bankruptcy. Strahan thus sued Landis. The trial court found in favor of Strahan, but the court of appeals reversed. The state supreme court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Calogero, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.