Southwest Engineering Co. v. Martin Tractor Co., Inc.
Kansas Supreme Court
473 P.2d 18 (1970)
Southwest Engineering Co. (Southwest) (plaintiff), a general contractor, wanted to bid on a government contract to construct lighting facilities at a military base. Southwest’s construction superintendent, R.E. Cloepfil, contacted Martin Tractor Co. (Martin) (defendant) to price generator equipment for a component of the project. On April 12, 1966, a manager at Martin, Ken Hurt, quoted a price of $18,500 and reconfirmed that price by phone on April 13. Southwest submitted a bid for the project on April 14, relying on Martin’s quote of $18,500. The bid was accepted, and Southwest reported the acceptance to Martin. On April 28, Cloepfil and Hurt met to discuss the project. Hurt provided Cloepfil with a handwritten memorandum itemizing a new price of $21,500 for the generator, and Cloepfil agreed to the increased price. In the top left-hand corner of the memorandum, Hurt wrote, “Ken Hurt, Martin Tractor, Topeka, Caterpillar.” Cloepfil and Hurt raised, but did not agree upon, a schedule of payment for the equipment. Martin ultimately failed to provide the generator, and Southwest was forced to buy the generator from another company for $27,541. Southwest sued Martin for breach of contract, and Martin responded that no contract had been formed between the parties. The trial court found that an agreement was in fact formed at the meeting on April 28, and judgment was entered for Southwest after a bench trial. Martin appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Fontron, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 709,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 709,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.