Southwest Texas Electrical Cooperative, Inc. v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
67 F.3d 87 (1995)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
The Southwest Texas Electrical Cooperative, Inc. (co-op) (plaintiff) was a tax-exempt organization. The co-op qualified for an approximately $5 million loan from the Rural Electrification Administration. The purpose of the loan was to help the co-op expand and upgrade its facilities. Under the conditions of the loan, the co-op could draw down funds only to reimburse the co-op for already-incurred construction expenses. Over the course of about two years, the co-op drew down approximately $2.5 million of the loan and used the proceeds to reimburse itself for construction costs. At this point, the co-op decided to self-fund continued construction to avoid incurring additional debt on its accounting books. Three years later, just before the co-op’s ability to draw down the remainder of the loan was set to expire, the co-op drew down the remaining $2.5 million, which it placed in its general fund. A few weeks later, the co-op purchased approximately $2.5 million in United States Treasury notes. The interest the co-op had to pay on its loan was 5 percent, whereas the Treasury notes paid the co-op 9 percent interest. The co-op did not pay any tax on its interest income from the Treasury notes. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) assessed a deficiency against the co-op, arguing that the interest income was unrelated business taxable income (UBTI), notwithstanding the co-op’s tax-exempt status. The co-op challenged the deficiency in the United States Tax Court. The Tax Court ruled in favor of the IRS, and the co-op appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.