Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. DeLanney

Supreme Court of Texas
809 S.W. 2d 493 (1991)


Facts

For several years, Eugene DeLanney (plaintiff) advertised his real-estate business in Southwestern Bell Telephone Company’s (Southwestern Bell) (defendant) Yellow Pages. DeLanney had two business phones: a rotary line and a single line. The Yellow Pages advertisement was connected to DeLanney’s single line. However, prior to renewing the Yellow Pages advertisement for the upcoming year, DeLanney’s wife asked Southwestern Bell to disconnect the single line. Consequently, Southwestern Bell cancelled DeLanney’s advertisement automatically when the single line was disconnected. After Southwestern Bell failed to include DeLanney’s Yellow Pages advertisement, DeLanney sued Southwestern Bell for negligence. After a jury trial, Southwestern Bell moved for a directed verdict. The trial court denied Southwestern Bell’s motion and submitted the case to the jury. The jury held for DeLanney and awarded him $109,000 in damages for lost profits and $40,000 for future lost profits. The trial court reduced the future lost-profits award to $21,480. Southwestern Bell appealed. The court of appeals affirmed and held that the company’s failure to perform under its contract with DeLanney was a basis for tort recovery, as well as recovery for breach of contract. The Supreme Court of Texas granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Phillips, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence (Gonzalez, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.