Sowell v. American Cyanamid Co.

888 F.2d 802 (1989)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sowell v. American Cyanamid Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
888 F.2d 802 (1989)

EL

Facts

James Sowell was a welder for a naval air station’s public-works department. Sowell was assigned the duty of welding a tank containing sulfuric acid. While Sowell was welding the tank, hydrogen combined with the tank’s sulfuric acid, causing an explosion that permanently injured Sowell. Sowell sued American Cyanamid Co. (the sulfuric acid supplier), J. B. Converse Co., Inc. (Converse) (the tank designer), and Sidney Harrison (the employee who told Sowell to begin welding) (defendants). Sowell brought failure-to-warn products-liability and negligence actions against American Cyanamid, Converse, and Harrison in federal district court. Sowell presented an expert at trial who stated that Converse’s act of supplying a safety manual to the Navy did not discharge its duty to warn end users such as Sowell. The expert also testified that visual safety warnings should have been placed on the tank. The jury found in favor of Sowell and awarded $1.2 million in damages. The district court disagreed with the jury’s findings and entered a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The court held that Sowell was not the user of the product to which American Cyanamid and Converse owed a warning. Sowell appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Allen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership