Spacesaver Systems v. Adam

98 A.3d 264 (2014)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Spacesaver Systems v. Adam

Maryland Court of Appeals
98 A.3d 264 (2014)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Amy Hamilton terminated Carla Adam’s (plaintiff) employment with Spacesaver Systems, Incorporated (Spacesaver) (defendant). Spacesaver, a mobile-storage-equipment company, was started by Jack and Alyce Schmidt. After 20 years in business, the Schmidts transferred ownership and control of Spacesaver to their three children, Adam, Hamilton, and David Craig. The three siblings were employed pursuant to employment agreements. The agreements permitted Spacesaver to terminate employees for cause. Craig resigned from Spacesaver not long after the siblings executed the employment agreements. Hamilton and Adam began to have disputes about job duties and compensation. Hamilton eventually sent Adam a letter terminating Adam’s employment. Adam filed an action for breach of contract against Spacesaver. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, which the trial court denied. The trial judge found that the employment agreement created a lifetime contract and that Spacesaver had breached the contract. The trial judge awarded Adam damages for lost salary and commission. Spacesaver appealed to the Maryland Court of Special Appeals, which affirmed in part, finding Adam was not an at-will employee, and reversed in part. The Maryland Court of Appeals granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Adkins, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership